ESCAPOLOGY (the escape pod’s blog)

Entries from October 2009

Listen to Steve Henry

October 30, 2009 · Leave a Comment

(if you don’t know who UK ad legend Steve Henry is, leave now! You are clearly not worthy.)

Recently Steve wrote this for his blog over at campaign magazine. Wise words.

MULTIPLE IDEAS

The best advice I can give you about pitching is this – brush your tongue as well as your teeth. Because 75% of the microbes which cause bad breath are on the tongue.

And 75% of pitches are about personal chemistry, not about ideas.

I remember when we used to get the intermediaries in to HHCL to talk about pitching. One of them told a very funny story about how a senior female client had said that she fancied “everyone in the room” of the agency which (surprise, surprise) went on to win the pitch.

It was a very funny story for lots of people – but not unfortunately for us, because we’d lost that particular pitch.

Again, I wonder if I’d spent more time in Savile Row and less time in Milletts, how different history might have been.

But as I said last week, if you want sexual chemistry, why not go to a speed-dating event ?

(Although in the case of some people I know, the dating would have to take place at the speed of light for them to pick up any positive responses.)

Pitches should be about ideas.

But don’t just take my word for it. Alex Bogusky is saying the same thing when he says agencies should be factories, rather than thinking they’re in the service industry.

And then, you have to look at one very important question.

Do you present one idea in the pitch, or several ?

Years ago, I remember writing a column where I criticised Saatchis for winning the Toyota pitch by using spectacular pitch theatre.

Basically, they’d somehow managed to get a Toyota into their Reception area, (by removing the glass from their windows, as I understood it) to create an impressive first impression.

I wrote rather huffily that surely strategic thinking was more important than knowing the phone number of a good glazier.

But the fact is that Simon Dicketts had come up with one of the best lines ever created for a pitch – “The car in front is a Toyota” – so it wasn’t empty theatre.

So, that’s one way of going about it – find a great idea and get 100% behind it.

And, if you’re pitching for Anusol, stick a giant arsehole in Reception.

(You’ve probably got one quite near there already.)

But look at the other option.

Because you could show a whole bunch of ideas – as long as all of them are provocative.

And then you could say – let’s make a few of these, and see what happens.

This is where it gets exciting. And this is what I think agencies should be advocating now.

Because creativity has changed fundamentally.

In bad, traditional agencies, 99% of the planning happens before the work breaks.

You get one script that takes 6 months to get through research, and it’s then put out there for a year or more, gathering dust and boring the pants off people.

In good agencies, at least 50% of the planning happens after the work breaks. Because half the skill of it is in developing and evolving it.

It has to be reactive, adaptive.

And that means being less precious about it all.

A very bright planner called Jon Leach who worked at HHCL was once working on a positioning statement for the agency – and he came up with the phrase “Strong opinions, lightly held”.

At the time I thought – that’s b*llocks, we’re about strong opinions, strongly held. But a minute later I thought – no, he’s right.

Rather proving him right, as it happened.

Because the agency loved to explore radical positions for clients, but we’d very rarely die on a sword for anything.

And I think we’d stumbled onto something very valuable about running work.

By being less precious about it, you can maybe create more value.

Present several ideas. Make several ideas. As I pointed out much later to the Whiskas client, there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

And all I care about is that the client does do something radical – rather than the invisible garbage which makes up 95% of our industry’s output.

When we first developed this multiple-idea approach all those years ago, we had to use research to help us pick the best idea out of several.

But that’s far from ideal – because research is tricky.

In fact, research is like sex.

Good research is very good, but bad research is the worst thing in the world.

It’s also like sex in that it involves one-way mirrors, cheap wine, M&S sausage rolls and some bored-looking women wondering if this is really the best use of their evening.

But these days you can push out several ideas and see which one gets talked about most on the internet – thus involving consumers directly and saving yourself the expense of using conventional research.

Because the one thing we know about conventional research is that it doesn’t work.

All new business launches use conventional research, but about 80% of them fail.

(That’s worse odds than avoiding halitosis.)

Categories: Uncategorized

Persistence pays

October 29, 2009 · 5 Comments

I have seen plenty of evidence that this is true in my own life. It is true. Reasonable people just give up after a certain point. thank god!

Although, like Groucho Marx said: If at first you don’t succeed, try, try,try again. Then quit. No point in making an idiot of yourself.

I had a very good example of how persistence can pay off from personal experience. In the late ’80s i went to an Irish music festival in london. i was just yet another young irish immigrant in the big smoke. The pogues, elvis costello etc were playing. it was a lot of fun. it was also very heavily policed and watched. choppers overhead etc. at the time the IRA were still exploding bombs in London. so understandably the cops paid extra attention to this event.

Between acts this middle-aged mother came out onto the stage. and in a quivering voice announced that her son had been imprisoned for 16 years for IRA pub bombings of which he and his three co-defendants were completely innocent of. It was incredibly moving. This poor woman had been doing this for years. Trying in vain to get her son, Gerry Conlon, out of prison. Her husband had died in prison a few years before. Their story was made into a movie called IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER, starring Daniel Day Lewis.

They were known as The Guilford Four. They were young Irish immigrants who had been tortured and made sign confessions admitting they had planted these bombs. Dodgy scientific evidence was the “proof” that they were the bombers. Like pretty much every nation that has to deal with terrorism, the UK had suspended normal justice procedures to deal with this threat. Under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1972, terrorism suspects could be held, without access to a lawyer for seven days. Well guess what happened. The cops, under severe pressure to get convictions for what were outrageous crimes, did whatever they had to do to get those convictions.

Anyway, seeing this poor woman made me determined to help in some way. So i started attending meetings of the organization to get these guys out of jail. I expected i would be part of a huge crowd. I wasn’t. It was a tiny group of mostly family members and was led by sympathetic English civil servants. i felt bad for them. there was clearly not a lot of hope of ever getting The Guilford four out of jail. They had been in jail for sixteen years at this point.

At their sentencing, the judge (who in the course of the trial had to have the concept of the T-shirt explained to him), said that his only regret was that the death penalty had been recently abolished for they would surely have merited it. instead they got 25 consecutive life sentences. Gerry Conlon was 18 years old.

The IRA itself had issued formal statements that they, not the people in jail, had committed the bombings. but to no avail. Both the BBC and ITV had done stellar investigative journalistic pieces that cast grave doubt on the convictions. all to no avail. it looked bleak. really bleak. they had exhausted their legal appeals and the story was old news.

Yet they never gave up. They kept chiselling away. Luckily they had an absolutely brilliant English lawyer in Gareth Pierce. She just kept hammering away for years. And then finally she found a key piece of evidence that had “gone missing”. Just like in the movie that was made about the case. it really happened like that. It was that dramatic.

And, just like in the movie, Gerry Conlon insisted on coming out the front door of the Old Bailey Courthouse. The other three had opted to be driven out the back door as the police advised. I remember because i was there. I had gotten the tip off from the family that maybe this was really it. And it was. We were surrounded by i would say, with no exaggeration, at least 2,000 english cops. After the dismissal of his conviction, Gerry strode out the front door to us (and the news media) and gave his famous protestation of his and the Birmingham 6’s innocence. Again, just like in the movie. It was incredibly moving. And it was the result of PURE persistence and faith. Nothing else. There was no way in hell these guys were EVER getting out.

It instantly became a huge news story in the UK and abroad. It was wild just to be even tangentially involved.

Funny follow up story that nobody knows. Three days after being released, a still-celebrating Gerry Conlon was in a car stopped by English cops on the motorway. There were drugs found in the car. The cop recognized Gerry and radioed HQ for further instructions. HQ said “Let them go!”.

Categories: Uncategorized

ANVIL! THE STORY OF ANVIL. SEE IT TODAY.

October 29, 2009 · 2 Comments

at the urging of twitter’s own @johnpatricwoods i netflixed ANVIL! a documentary about a Canadian metal band. it was simply amazing. inspiring, funny, sad, immersive. It has everything. Anvil almost shook the hand of fame and fortune in the early 80s. i recall seeing them once in support of AC/DC (or was it Motorhead?). They were a really good and influential band but they just never got the breaks. Yet they plodded on. Never giving up hope.

And then one day they got a call from a longtime fan, Sacha Gervasi, an English Anvil fan who is now a successful hollywood screenwriter (and rumored to be the basis for Toby Young’s successful nemesis in the hilarious “how to lose friends and alienate people”). Sacha tracked them down and chronicled a year in their lives. He got lucky. Thirty years on the Jewish-Canadian rockers were weary but still unreasonably hopeful of success. It’s touching to see their faith in themselves and their music. And the film itself is really deftly handled. Which in doc terms means they got a great editor! Coz that’s where documentaries come together. In fact i am tempted to do a doc myself now. Look out world. I have a hi-def camera.

I highly recommend watching ANVIL! I haven’t been this psyched in a while.

Categories: Uncategorized

A smart idea

October 28, 2009 · Leave a Comment

i came across this in the newspaper this morning. it’s a neat little idea to promote the upcoming release of a kids’ movie. Alvin and the Chipmunks 2: the squeakquel!

my son and his friends LOOOOOVED the first incarnation of this, which was a big hit. It featured the legendary David Cross getting paid and doing a great turn as a record company bad guy out to exploit the falsetto singing chipmunks. innocent fun for innocent kids.

the movie comes out around christmas. and someone had the smart idea of doing a print ad that featured a chipmunk stencil pattern that kids (ie: their dads) can carve onto halloween pumpkins.

A nice idea that makes sense and is involving and adds to peoples’ lives. yes advertising can be more than empty hype. But only if you try!

photo

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

U2 LIVE ON YOUTUBE. A GOOD IDEA.

October 27, 2009 · 5 Comments

Last Sunday night U2 played the Rose Bowl in California to a crowd of 80,000 fans. The gig was broadcast live in HiDef on YouTube. As you would expect from U2, the production values were impeccable – great camera work and staging. Watching it full screen on my new iMac with Bose speakers it felt like something new. Obviously I’ve seen U2 on screens before but this was special. It elevated the YouTube experience and the brand. U2 will probably sell a lot of records because of this broadcast, which was watched by over 7 million people. But arguably YouTube is the one that will benefit most from this. It was a great showcase for a technology that though hugely popular, is dogged by a somewhat inaccurate rep of just having low-brow, amateurish content. I can now readily imagine the Superbowl being broadcast live on YouTube. Why not?

Increasingly YouTube is forging relationships with movie studios and other producers of high end content.

Orson Welles famously said that the tragedy of film makers is that they are the artists that cannot afford their own tools. And it’s true. Despite technological advances, it still takes a small village to shoot film/video correctly. But equally importantly, it still takes talent and drive and vision to create great content. Look at U2.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: ,

Video. The past and the future of advertising.

October 26, 2009 · 4 Comments

images
i’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. And here’s my conclusion. What does everyone love? a funny video. and if that funny video happens to be an ad it doesn’t really matter. so long as it’s hilarious. if you are truly compelling, you can get away with murder. being exciting works! ask anheuser-busch. and it’s great fun.

So ironically, after all that hand-wringing about microsites and widgets and social media, my conclusion is to create an involving video. if you have a better idea, let me know. but it seems to me, from experience, that video is still the shortest distance from A to B. why? because it’s effortless.

Let’s face it, reading stuff is kind of a pain in the ass. and interacting with stuff is even more of a pain in the ass. Watching stuff is comparatively easier. therefore video wins. and will always win.

Categories: Uncategorized

IS THE “BIG IDEA” DEAD?

October 21, 2009 · 4 Comments

Lately there has been some discussion over whether the big idea in advertising is dead. I should point out that, in my opinion, most of the proponents of this idea tend to come from people who work exclusively in the digital realm on the production side. And so arguably have a vested interest in the big campaign idea being dead. After all if the big idea is dead, there will be a demand for lots of little ideas. Presumably. It is true that the big — in terms of media spend — campaign idea makes less sense in the Internet age. Being responsive and tuned into the culture and the media just makes sense now in a way it wouldn’t have ten years ago.

Let me describe my notion of what constitutes a BIG IDEA. A big idea is one that is pregnant with meaning for lots of people. The very idea of it is exciting. The idea of Volvo as a safe car was a big idea. And an enduring one. Do you care about your child’s safety? Drive a Volvo. Nike’s glorification of the sweating athlete is a big idea. Big ideas tend to be elemental. That is, they speak to something fundamental in humanity.

Big ideas also make everyone’s life easier. We have all had brilliant ideas for Nike based on the UST DO IT idea. Oh sure, now it’s easy. Big ideas are participatory. Everyone can add to a big idea. If it’s a struggle to that, you don’t have a big idea. That’s the best test really.

My old boss (the guy who had the big idea for Volvo and others) used to say that big ideas go everywhere. Small ideas go nowhere.

There’s a big difference between a campaign idea and a big idea. A campaign idea can contain a big idea. But usually they don’t. Usually they’re just what the client wants you to hear. They are one sided. Big ideas have room for communication and adoption and resonance in the culture.

A big idea can be a campaign idea but it doesn’t necessarily have to be one.

So if the big idea isn’t dead, is the campaign idea dead? Not if it’s a big idea!

;-)

Categories: Uncategorized

I got a new sticker for my Mac! (Am I running out of material?)

October 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Sorry but some things are just too good not to comment on. I think this is one of them. Lots of folks got apple mac computers that they would just love to personalize, but dread marring what is a pretty sweet design. so creating apple logo centric things is a very smart way to go. it enhances what’s already there. and kind of pays homage to it too.

i got this doozy via Vinylville on etsy.com. It’s called “Snow White’s Revenge”. Snow White…apple…etc. don’t ask me what the mask is about. that’s why it’s art!!! Only 15 bucks.

i just know i will spend a lot of time explaining where i got this from. so i figured i might as well start now.

Here we go…

il_430xN.96937619-1

Categories: Uncategorized

Balloon Boy, Twitter, and the Online News Eclipse

October 19, 2009 · 1 Comment

i am a big fan and user of twitter. for a creative person it’s great mental chewing gum and generally keeps your pulse active. and, increasingly it’s serving as a news service, albeit an unfiltered and not always reliable one.

So when the Balloon Boy story hit twitter i was on it. Of course I was completely 100% suckered and totally believed that there was a six year old boy floating above Colorado. I had no reason to believe otherwise. I have an eight year old son myself and could readily imagine how such a thing might happen.

The Ballloon Boy story was the perfect example of an ONLINE NEWS ECLIPSE. I just coined that term btw, so all royalties this way please. An online news eclipse is what happens when a story like Balloon Boy (great human interest, bizarre, happening “live”) instantly monpolizes the attention of everyone , blotting out (or eclipsing!) all the traditional news outlets. It was an instant viral hit literally within minutes of first being reported. How we feel about the story can overwhelm what’s actually happening. Or not happening in this case. I was freaking out at the thought of a little six year old in almost certain mortal terror. As was any parent.

Turns out the whole thing was a fake. There was no balloon boy. Just another wannabe who wanted to get his face on TV at any cost. Well he got his wish. Thought not in the way he wanted. 15 years ago this would have been a blip on the news at ten. Now it can dominate our attention for hours. LIVE!

I get the feeling we are going to see a lot more of this. It’s inevitable. We’re all so connected and inter-connected on such a granular level that we no longer have time to think. We just react.

The whole episode reminded me of a quote about the future of media i saw years ago that had a huge influence on me professionally. It went something like…IN THE FUTURE PEOPLE WILL NO LONGER THINK AND READ. THEY WILL MERELY WATCH AND FEEL.

Kind of feels like we’re at that point. And I don’t know if it’s a good thing or a bad thing. Or, most probably, a good thing and a bad thing.

Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , ,

Direct communication. Irish style

October 15, 2009 · 5 Comments

A friend from Ireland recently sent me this. It needs no explanation.

8430_173838127500_47430762500_3776504_5349248_n

Categories: Uncategorized